February 6, 2014 Update: Yesterday Canada’s Finance Minister announced Canada has signed a FATCA Intergovernmental Agreement with the United States. That may or may not change some of the information provided here. We will update as we learn more about what this may mean.
February 10, 2014 Update: Canada Revenue Agency has released some information on FATCA. Again, we don’t know exactly what this will mean, but this information could be important:
Will my financial institution be asking me if I was born in the U.S.?
A financial institution complying with the agreement will not be required to ask its account holders about their place of birth.If a financial institution, applying the due diligence rules of the agreement to its accounts, discovers any records connected to the account that have an unambiguous indication of a U.S. place of birth, the financial institution may treat the account as a reportable account or follow up with the account holder to obtain documentation that shows the account holder is not a U.S. resident or U.S. citizen.
Does the agreement require Canadian financial institutions to report to the CRA on any individuals who were told that they relinquished their U.S. citizenship when they became Canadian citizens?
The agreement does not require Canadian financial institutions to report on any individuals who have relinquished their U.S. citizenship and are not residents of the U.S.
Most of our banks won’t have an “unambiguous U.S. place of birth in their records because they were not able to ask that question when we opened accounts with them.
ORIGINAL POST FOLLOWS:
Can a bank refuse to open an account for me because I was born in the United States? Can a Canadian bank close my long-standing account because I won’t tell them where I was born or I won’t give consent for my very personal banking information to be sent to IRS?
Do I have to keep my life savings in a piggy bank to keep it safe from the United States?
Those are common questions we all have had since FATCA attacked our responsible, honest lives. Many of us have been customers at the same bank for years or decades. In some cases, staff who have known us all that time are aware of our U.S. connection. In other cases, they are not aware of it.
I am not a lawyer or banker and this information is not intended as legal or professional advice. It is simply some of the pieces of the puzzle which I have learned over the past two year.
The first thing to do is take a deep breath. Let it out slowly. Calm yourself.
In Canada, we have had no reports of a Canadian bank closing or refusing to open an account for anyone because of birthplace. That puts us far ahead of our friends in many other countries around the world.
The next thing to do is to know your rights under Canadian banking, privacy and human rights laws. This post will focus on Access to Basic Banking Services.
These regulations are complex. However, their meaning is communicated in easy-to-understand language from the Canadian Bankers Association. Yes, that’s the same organization that is insisting it must comply with FATCA.
But, check it out. To open an account, you must present two pieces of identification. These can include:
Canadian birth certificate, a Canadian driver’s license, your Canadian Social Insurance Number, Canadian citizenship certificate, Canadian permanent resident card, Canadian passport, Canadian old age security card, etc.
Did you notice only a Canadian birth certificate can be used to open an account in Canada? A foreign birth certificate cannot be used! That is hugely significant–and makes Canada different from many countries around the world which require a birth certificate for opening an account.
Except for a Canadian passport, there is nothing on that list that reveals your place of birth. So, the solution is clear. Don’t use a Canadian passport with a US place of birth opening an account. Use the other pieces of ID.
Children born in Canada to parents born in United States will, of course, have a Canadian birth certificate, so there should be no way for the bank to know if they may be considered to be “US persons.” For them, presenting that Canadian birth certificate may be their best protection.
The bank does have the right to know your date of birth. This is very different from knowing your place of birth. A driver’s license, citizenship certificate, permanent resident card and Old Age Security card all contain this information–but not place of birth. You are also required to provide your address and occupation–unless you are homeless or unemployed.
So, again, you are under no obligation to tell your bank where you were born to open an account. If they ask, just stick to the information they are entitled to know.
According to CBA, a bank can refuse to open an account if:
You plan to use it for illegal or fraudulent purposes; You have a history of fraudulent activity in financial services within the past seven years; You knowingly made false statements to open the account; You would subject other customers or employees to physical harm, harassment or abuse; You refuse to consent to verification of identification used to open the account.
Again, I don’t see anything there that says they can refuse an account if you refuse to tell them where you were born.
The bank is required to obtain your SIN for accounts that provide income so that income can be reported to CRA. You are not required to provide SIN for non-income accounts.
So, can a bank close an account if you refuse to tell them if you might be considered to be a “US person” or refuse to give consent for information to be transmitted to IRS?
Access to Basic Banking Services does not specifically address the issue of closing accounts. However, in a letter to US Treasury and IRS, TD Vice-President said (page 3):
If an FFI closed an account because such information was not provided, the purpose of ABBS would be frustrated, and in addition, the FFI would subject to fines. Each violation of the ABBS requirements would subject the financial institution to a penalty of up to $200,000.
Even if an FFI could close an account of an uncooperative account holder, an FFI could not refuse to reopen an account for such individual if adequate identification under ABBS were again provided.
Despite all of that, Canadian Bankers Association FATCA Information for Clients says:
The majority of Canadians are not U.S. persons and, in most cases, FATCA will have little impact. If you have an existing account and there is an indication that you may be a U.S. person, or if you are opening a new account, your financial institution may ask you to provide additional information or documentation to demonstrate that you are not a U.S. person.
If you choose not to provide this additional documentation upon request, at a minimum, your financial institution may be required to withhold a tax of 30% on U.S. source paymentsthat you receive and send this money to the IRS. Also, your financial institution may refuse to open an account or may be required to close existing accounts.
CBA is sending mixed messages on its own website. It’s important we stand up to the banks and ensure that the rights CBA outlines in Access to Basic Banking Services are not compromised by their statement on FATCA. It’s also important we remain vigilant to ensure the government does not change those laws.
It’s also important to note this information applies to basic banking services only. Investment accounts are treated differently and some people have already been asked by investment arms of banks or by investment firms the “US person” question. I do not know the legalities of this or if anyone has challenged it.
In addition, credit unions fall under provincial jurisdiction, so they are regulated by the provinces and territories.
NOTE: The author is not a lawyer. Information on this page is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. If you believe you might have issues with US or any other legal authorities you should contact an attorney
Blaze, this does make me feel better. So one can say I am a Canadian to their bank and nothing will happen.
@Dar: Exactly. If all else fails, there is always the piggy bank. 🙂
So the if CBA and the member banks seem to be a little confused about exactly what our rights and their obligations are; a couple of $200,000 fines should clarify things for them, right?
Seriously, I don’t think the banks will press this too hard. It’s a lose- lose for them. Ask a question, get a satisfactory answer, let it go. They have no desire to play detective for the IRS.
@Maz: Yep, those fines and the costs of lawsuits would quickly add up.
By the way, someone pointed out in an e-mail that most of the banks also have ABBS on their own websites.
A very helpful and important post since the banks are how the US wants to detect “US persons”. For investment accounts, even if ABBS does not apply, we should still be protected under section 15 of the Charter.
@Mr. A: I really wish we could get some information about investment accounts. Several people have already reported being asked the “US” question and being presented with a form (W8 perhaps).
Some already had a CLN. One responded N/A. I do not know if anyone has challenged this legally.
Is there anyone who can comment or share information or experiences?
This may be a question to ask at the Information Sessions.
earlier this week i went and saw my finacial advisor who looks after my rrsp’s. kinda scary in that he did not even know what fatca was all about to start with and kept insiting i was talking about fbar.
once he looked up fatca and had a quick read of it he said “oh don’t worry this does not concern you.” i am tempted to switch fincial advisors but don’t really want to take the tax hit by moving all my rrsp’s out of his firm.
anyways the long and short of it was that he would not be asking me nor any other clients of his for proof of citzenship. which i guess is a good thing considering his lack of knowedge reguarding fatca.
@ Blaze
I can confirm that it’s not just the general public that have questions about investment accounts. I recently had conversations with investment advisors from 2 different large bank-owned brokerage firms. They were asking me what I knew about what was going on with FATCA.
They had not received any information, training, memos, etc. on FATCA as of yet.
@Hazy: Do you know how investment firms and investment branches of Canadian banks are able to ask the “US” question now–which some have?
Do you have any suggestions about how people could respond?
@ Blaze
For the past decade or so most Canadian investment firms have signed a Qualified Intermediary (QI) agreement with the IRS. This allows for a reduced withholding on US source investment income. Usually, once an account holder purchased a US based investment, they would be sent a W8-Ben to be eligible for a 15% withholding rather than the default 30% withholding ( on dividends).
If you are a USP, then a W9 should be filled out instead.
I believe it is only recently that questions about being a USP have started to appear on account opening applications.
Can someone ask the lawyer what is the implication if self certificatiopn on US person if is incorrect. I do not own any US stocks. Just to be safe. I like Canadian dividend tax credit and doing your taxes is a lot easier when you do no not have to do the extra work. When I did own canadian based international mutual fund the I had to see CRA agent 1 or 2 times because of foreign. In the end what I submitted in April was accepted.
Everything was on T2 & T5 but you had do a separate form for each country. An agent recently told me just call it various. Supposedly you could not file electronically if you had more than $200 tax credit from more than 1 country.
There was a story from Benedict Arnold at Issac Brock society where they closed down his account at TD because they saw a US birth place.
They ask for SSN.
I had a SSN 35 years ago threw it out with Green card over 30 years ago.
it should say T3 & T5
All this talk of investment institutions asking the US question revived a couple of long unused neurons in my brain. I rooted around in my filing cabinet and finally found the original account application for my investment account of many years.
Sure enough, there was blank asking for “citizenship”. I had written in “Canada” even though I was still a PR! I recall thinking at the time that it would be much simpler to not open that particular can of US worms. Was I prescient or what?!!
I guess the moral here is that we shouldn’t be afraid to color outside of the lines a little bit!
@Maz57 Good crystal ball you had. What does it tell you about what Flaherty will do?
@Blaze. Last time I saw Flaherty on TV a few weeks ago he looked very ill. I hope he’s doing OK; he seems to be a decent guy. (He made me mad as hell back in 2006 with the income trust thing but I’ve gotten over it!)
Some seem to think that he might have an announcement on FATCA on Feb. 11 when he presents the budget; I’m not so sure. He apparently moved budget day up about a month from the usual March date so the Cons can get some good news out there to counter all the bad news lately.
There’s not really any upside in FATCA for them so I’m not so sure they’ll want it to confuse their budget message. An IGA would hardly be a foreign policy triumph now would it?
All this is a roundabout way of saying I don’t have a clue.
I have contacted a social security administration office regarding a social security number. I am 51 years old and have never had a number as I have lived 42 of those years in Canada. I became a Canadian citizen in the 1993. Apparently, you must make an appointment at the nearest embassy to apply for a number because I am over the age of 12 applying for the first time.However, I am told a birth certificate isn’t enough. It’s the documentation I have and can’t even get a passport without one. I can’t comply with the IRS or the US border crossing. Anyone else in this situation?
@Ann: I’m going to ask some questions before answering. Why are you applying for a SSN? Have you you had a U.S. passport since becoming a Canadian citizen in 1993? Have you voted in U.S. elections?
Ann. Don’t rush. It is probable that you shouldn’t try to get a social security no. or a passport. You may haverelinquished US citizenship in 1993.
In that case there is no need to file anything. Slow down. As you learn more, you will gain confidence.
New account holders at all banks are already being asked to certify their place of birth is/not US:
http://www.habibcanadian.com/downloads/HCB_Personal_AOF.pdf
@Allan: Yikes!
Why do you say all banks are now asking that question. That is a form from one bank. Why do you think it will be used by all banks?
I wonder what will happen if someone refuses to complete it.
So much for CRA saying financial institutions are not required to ask for place of birth.
Creepy. FWIW, I noticed there’s a Swiss connection. The form says that Habib Canadian Bank is “A Subsidiary of Habib Bank AG Zurich.”